By which time there will be sufficient engine revs to get the turbo up to speed and take over.
I personally think it's a waste of time. Sequential bi-turbo is the way to go.
supercharge or turbocharge?
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by kevhaywire » July 25th, 2006, 9:54 pm
What you need is a Mad Max style electronic clutch on the supercharger so that it can be switched out automatically, or manually By which time there will be sufficient engine revs to get the turbo up to speed and take over.
I personally think it's a waste of time. Sequential bi-turbo is the way to go.
By which time there will be sufficient engine revs to get the turbo up to speed and take over.
I personally think it's a waste of time. Sequential bi-turbo is the way to go.
94 VR6 Turbo
-
kevhaywire - :: Super Mod ::
- Posts: 22383
- Joined: March 5th, 2003, 8:52 pm
- Location: Essex
- Gender: Male
by CorradoDriver » July 26th, 2006, 5:34 am
what would give you more power??
No car = no problems,
No problems = Nothing to fix,
Nothing to fix = Boredom
I want my car back!
No problems = Nothing to fix,
Nothing to fix = Boredom
I want my car back!
-
CorradoDriver - :: CF Enthusiast ::
- Posts: 333
- Joined: May 7th, 2006, 5:09 am
- Location: GOOD OLD USA
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Want to help monthly? Why not
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group • Monitored by mon.itor.us