Jump to content
jamiehamy

Pad coverage of disc - rear

Recommended Posts

Hey,

 

Got new pads and discs for the rear of the S4, however the pad doesn't cover the whole of the discs area, about 6mm short. I noticed this with my sisters Polo too but can't remember for the Rado. These are Pagid pads n discs.

 

Is this fairly normal? I know the fronts on the rado cover the whole area of the discs (312 TT's).

 

Anyone else come across this and wondered? Just seems like a waste of disc and that performance would be reduced.

 

100220121831.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the old disk have the same width braking surface? or is it the pads that are narrower?

I wouldn't have thought it would make a lot of difference on the back, pads are half the size of the fronts anyway and don't need to disperse nearly as much energy.

I love the new coated disks though, the ones on the back of my golf and corrado look nearly new after a year each has been on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

standard brembo replacement disks, think pagid are the same now, depends on the stock I had a set of non-abs rears ordered by mistake for the 8v (4 stud) and they came coated, the ABS ones weren't??? so I just swapped the abs rings over as the disks themselves are identical. all the recent disks I've ordered have come through coated now though, rear 5 studs on the golf were too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...