Johnboy98 0 Posted July 3, 2004 Thought you guys 'n' Gals might appreciate this link ;) http://www.syclone.freeserve.co.uk/rivals_cars.htm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VR6 0 Posted July 3, 2004 Sorted link for you.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted July 3, 2004 37 seconds for the 2CV, FBLOL! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VR6 0 Posted July 3, 2004 Surprised it gets there at all! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Johnboy98 0 Posted July 3, 2004 LOL, WTF didn't look down that far someones got a good sense of humour ;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy92 0 Posted July 10, 2004 haha, some one was bored ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vr6storm 0 Posted July 10, 2004 general car chat............methinks :wink: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dtjames 0 Posted July 11, 2004 http://www.carfolio.com/ This one is much more up to date :wink: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Henny 0 Posted July 11, 2004 those have cheered me up now... there's some serious motors that are slower than mine (15.345) in that list... 8) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhatVR6 0 Posted July 12, 2004 1994 230 5.7 14.5 Caterham 7 1700SS 1987 133 2.2 5.6 18.6 14.5 Jaguar XJR 1994 321 5.7 15.1 14.5 Subaru Impreza Turbo WRX 2000 215 2.0 5.7 16.9 14.5 95 Mitsubishi 3000GT 1992 281 5.8 16.1 14.5 Marcos 2.0 GTS Spyder 1998 197 2.2 5.9 14.9 14.5 98 Noble M10 V6 1999 168 2.0 5.9 16.9 14.5 95 Morgan Plus 8 4.6 1997 220 2.2 6.0 15.3 14.5 97 Audi S8 1997 340 2.2 6.0 14.6 14.5 Mercedes CL500 Auto 2000 306 2.5 6.0 15.0 14.5 99 Audi 80 S2 Estate 1993 230 6.2 14.5 Lamborghini Miura 14.5 for me!! :mrgreen: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Henny 0 Posted July 12, 2004 Off topic I know, but, were you having as much problems getting grip as I was Phat? Just kept spinning it in 1st and 2nd... :| Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhatVR6 0 Posted July 12, 2004 nope! I ran a 2.105 60' time, f*cking mint! then again, I was running Dunlop slicks with 20psi in them :-P Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpencerTramm 0 Posted July 12, 2004 Yeah, I was, changing from 1st to 2nd I was all over the place, had to get out of it, straighten it up and put the boot back in, still ran a 9.7 :wink: Short shifted 2nd pass and it was moving around although it wasn't getting any worse, 9.35 on a RWYB track ain't bad I think :mrgreen: Met quite a few of the CCGB people too :) Spencer Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
corozin 0 Posted July 12, 2004 I wonder if the data in the list on that first link is for the Corrado SLC rather than the VR6 because I've seen lots of VR6s run sub 16s even for standard cars, and 15.5s is possible with a decent driver. The list quotes 17.7s :? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanA 0 Posted July 13, 2004 I wonder if the data in the list on that first link is for the Corrado SLC rather than the VR6 because I've seen lots of VR6s run sub 16s even for standard cars, and 15.5s is possible with a decent driver. The list quotes 17.7s :? I think your looking at the 0-100 time there, the 1/4 mile is down as 15.1. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites