Jump to content
VR6 Lee

Kent Cams on VR

Recommended Posts

The last email I got from kent when I stated that there was a difference in 'lift' between kent and schimmel cams they said the below

 

Yes our cams are fast road grinds and the lift difference is minimal. Our have slightly more duration. So power is about the same

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Had Kent Cams on a Firenza HPF many years ago, coupled with think twin Webber 48's from memory and full engine rebuild, went very, very well.

Kent normally do them in 3 profiles from memory, 2 for road, one full race, it's just about the amount barely tickover etc., and without other engine mods. to back up could be counter productive. Easier in days you just got bigger carbs, manifold exhausts, maybe fruity pistons and overbore to match.

 

Kent used to specialise in Ford engines, Vauxhall to lesser extent, just based on relative rarity of VR6 in UK Schimmel probs got more experience and testing, prtobs more driveability.

 

The running in process is vital too from memory.

 

i thought running in process was only vital when a full rebuild had taken place?

 

i asked vince about such during my head rebuild & he said no need when just adding cams & remap

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The last email I got from kent when I stated that there was a difference in 'lift' between kent and schimmel cams they said the below

 

Yes our cams are fast road grinds and the lift difference is minimal. Our have slightly more duration. So power is about the same

 

so the time that the extra lift is open does have an impact on power output, i thought it might

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not biased or anything but 263s are the best cams for the vr6.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not biased or anything but 263s are the best cams for the vr6.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

lol that is the gist i got before i brought mine too

 

im sure i had read somewhere that the 263's were better suited for the 12v VR6 than the 268's

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lol that is the gist i got before i brought mine too

 

im sure i had read somewhere that the 263's were better suited for the 12v VR6 than the 268's

Yep the 268s were lumpy at idle whereas 263s just right.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not biased or anything but 263s are the best cams for the vr6.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

True as!! They suit na and they suit boost!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many years ago they were developed in engines,As are all our cams. when the engine was in production. I don’t have any power graphs anymore.

 

Thats the last corespondence from Kent

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it Subcool that has a TSR engine conversion?

 

I'm sure they fitted Kent cams to their engines? Maybe he has a power graph?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...