Bobbywhacker 0 Posted May 28, 2004 As the Subject header may have given away, I'm currently in the process of making my own DIY induction cone relocating kit, very similar to the Turn2 one (only much cheaper :D ) I've taken off the CC and invested in a small breather filter for the clear pipe (thats the petrol breather right?), I'm now wondering should I instead plumb this pipe directly into, what will be, the induction pipe just past the cone filter? Sure I've read something about this, but I can't remember if it was a good/bad or dangerous thing to do.. can someone please enlighten me!! Soon as its complete, pics will be posted. Cheers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VR6 0 Posted June 1, 2004 I think the only problem with plumbing the petrol and crankcase breathers back into the induction (unfiltered), is potentially dirtying the MAF sensor. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted June 1, 2004 Indeedy, these should always be introduced to the inlet downstream of the MAF to avoid running problems. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhatVR6 0 Posted June 1, 2004 simple, vent the oil and the petrol breather off to atmostphere instead Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
corradovr6sc 0 Posted June 1, 2004 There's a hole in the chassis rail to shove the fuel line into. That's how mine is and I don't get any petrol fumes in the cabin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bobbywhacker 0 Posted June 2, 2004 cool cool... wasn't sure if introducing the petrol fumes to the air would help or hinder performance! But cheers for the replies, I will use the RC car breather instead now.... btw the air relocation kit is being constructed out of a passet pipe.. keep it in the family Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
