ozowen 2 Posted September 23, 2009 check out the link below and add your comments............ http://www2.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/200846323118890/sort/pricedesc/search-target/usedcars/make/skoda/model/felicia/page/1 Is it a :clap: or a :cuckoo: Blackberries VRT now looks like the bargain of the year Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peppyuk 0 Posted September 23, 2009 What am I looking at? It's just an old Skoda with a typo on the price. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Critical_Mass 10 Posted September 23, 2009 What am I looking at? It's just an old Skoda with a typo on the price. :lol: Its got a 2.8 V6 in it? :shrug: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tyler 0 Posted September 23, 2009 well overpriced but looks to be a clean car but putting in a vr engine in something that weighs the same as bake bean tin uis nuts Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peppyuk 0 Posted September 23, 2009 If I had stuck a 2.8 V6 into one of those, when I came to sell it I would have some details of the conversion, also some photos of the engine bay. Not to mention I wouldn't have all the details for a 1.6 model on the page either. As for weight, by the time you dropped a V6 and all the extra bits in to make it work I doubt it will be much lighter than a Corrado. I've sent a message asking a few more questions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ozowen 2 Posted September 24, 2009 I kinda like it; :ignore: what really got me was how similar the front end looks to the Octavia1. Mega overpriced though at about 2k if everything in it was properly done. Kid bro just bought a 99V Felica Estate with the 19 Derv for commuting between N.Wales and Swindon he paid £440 and it only has 66k and service history Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted September 24, 2009 Absolutley hideous. A waste of a good engine imo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Critical_Mass 10 Posted September 24, 2009 Absolutley hideous. A waste of a good engine imo. So you DO like the VR6 engine, Kev? :wink: :lol: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dr_mat 0 Posted September 24, 2009 "Fuel consumption (urban) 29.8 mpg Fuel consumption (extra urban) 53.9 mpg Fuel consumption (combined) 40.9 mpg" Oink oink, flap flap.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Critical_Mass 10 Posted September 24, 2009 Confusing ad, it has a 2.8 engine but according to the ad only has 75bph with a top speed of 106 mph. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ozowen 2 Posted September 24, 2009 Confusing ad, it has a 2.8 engine but according to the ad only has 75bph with a top speed of 106 mph. For some reason the seller gives a genetic description with the following : Please note The data displayed above details the usual specification of the most recent model of this vehicle. It is not the exact data for the actual vehicle being offered for sale and data for older models may vary slightly. We recommend that you always check the details with the seller prior to purchase. * Fitted as standard :cuckoo: I presume they are like a broker Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted September 24, 2009 Absolutley hideous. A waste of a good engine imo. So you DO like the VR6 engine, Kev? :wink: :lol: My predictable answer to that is:- Yes, providing it's turboed :lol: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Critical_Mass 10 Posted September 24, 2009 Absolutley hideous. A waste of a good engine imo. So you DO like the VR6 engine, Kev? :wink: :lol: My predictable answer to that is:- Yes, providing it's turboed :lol: :lol: :thumb right: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
