Pat_McCrotch 0 Posted December 19, 2004 Anybody? Or at least has anyone driven one before? Just need to know how they compare in terms of general day-to-day driving when compared with a 2.0 16V? :) Reason I ask is, 8v's seem to command about £500 less than the equivalent 16v's despite being in same general condition. Me not being much of a speed freak, just wondering if they really are as bad as people portray them? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhatVR6 0 Posted December 19, 2004 Mine WAS an 8v. I loved it it put out 137BHP at dubsport. nice torquey motor. needs a decent cam in it though to liven up the top end. People who portray them as bad probably haven't driven one. I know I'd much rather have a 2.0 8v over any 1.8 16v that's for sure. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pat_McCrotch 0 Posted December 19, 2004 Excellent :D Do you know if Schrick (or Shreek! as I used to call them :lol: ) do a Cam for them? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PhatVR6 0 Posted December 19, 2004 I would have thought so. My mate got cracking results off a 2.0 8v with a piper cam in it. apparenlty the cam specs were very mild due to the cat and emmission bollocks. not sure how true that is though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
coullstar 0 Posted December 19, 2004 I had a 94 with AMD remap, K&N and Supersprint exhaust and it put out 127bhp and torque was about 120ft-lb. Before the remap etc it was shit. Just felt too slow but I dont think it was in all honesty. Probably the most sensible and economic one to run everyday. I got rid off it and went for a G60 as I wasnt going to pay for the insurance for a car that didnt excite me. 2l 16v is far better. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Musicman 0 Posted December 19, 2004 Er, yes, but not the kind you're asking about ;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 19, 2004 My 8v is wicked... G60 count yeh? 8) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chrishill 0 Posted December 19, 2004 137bhp is about the standard unmodded bhp of a 1.8 16v, IIRC the 2.0 16v is about the same as they added a cat which restricts the power a bit, but it has more tourqe. I guess the best way to find out is to test drive a few and see what you think. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rado-steve 0 Posted December 20, 2004 it also depends if you like to screw the ass out of your car to get it to go! I generally love screaming mine into 7 grand so prefer valvers to 8V's Horses for courses, it's still a c at the end of the day! steve Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Campaign 0 Posted December 20, 2004 Er, yes, but not the kind you're asking about ;) Me too :lol: 142bhp... 1.9l with Schrick Cams Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites