Adam Darby 0 Posted April 11, 2006 hi all just after some advise on suspension hights for my corrado. Its lowered 40mm at the mo but im putting some new ones on i notices that some cars lower the front slightly more apart from looks what purpose does this surve. cheers Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gaz the geezer 0 Posted April 11, 2006 ....none probaly, just aesthetics, but if you got a few mates in the back then it will soon level out Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
double-6s 0 Posted April 11, 2006 you got some pretty small mates then Garry? A few mates in the back of a C??? :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gaz the geezer 0 Posted April 11, 2006 .....i have shoe horn and i`m not afraid to use it ....damn it, smilies wont fecking load up, never mind Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
double-6s 0 Posted April 11, 2006 Yeah thats what i use to get the kids in ;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam Darby 0 Posted April 11, 2006 so have the car the same hight all the way round Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gaz the geezer 0 Posted April 11, 2006 so have the car the same hight all the way round why not :wink: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam Darby 0 Posted April 11, 2006 like i said ive noticed some car's that have lowered the front slightly more that the back. Is this just for look's or does it make that handeling any better Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chrishill 0 Posted April 11, 2006 I 'think' they're slightly higher at the back as standard anyway, so lowering 40mm all around will still leave you with the back looking a tad higher than the front. Both my 16v and my VR appeared higher at the back, only slightly though. I've a feeling you can get 40/60 suspension kits to level things out a bit but I've been told that could effect handling, not sure how true that is since the people running coilovers dont seem to be complaining! edit - also, knackered topmounts will lower the car further, a put -40mm springs on my valver with the original topmounts and it looked more like -80mm at the front! :? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam Darby 0 Posted April 11, 2006 cheers i think ill just stick to 40mm all round cant go wrong then Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dinkus 10 Posted April 11, 2006 Generally the lowering springs are the same drop all round, but you have to bear in mind that the heavy engine is at the front, you sit in the middle and there's a 50 (or 70) litre petrol tank slung over the rear wheels. Petrol has a density of 0.73 - 1 litre of petrol weighs 730g. So a full 70 litre tank of petrol weighs about 50kg. Which will make quite a difference in the heights of the suspension ;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kick Up The Rs 0 Posted April 12, 2006 I parked my near std G60 against an Vr6 the other day and the Vr looked monster truck like in terms of ride height. Is the G60 generally lower than a VR (and valver). I have std springs... Just curious Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Supercharged 2 Posted April 12, 2006 Kick Up The R's, yes - the later VR's were very high compared to previous models... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted April 12, 2006 Ideally you want the back higher than the front, 5-10mm (measure from a uniform edge, such as the sill). This reduces lift under acceleration and the more lift you get, the more positive camber you get which reduces grip. You also want to keep the roll centre and roll axis as close to stock as possible for optimum handling and grip. Slamming completely f'cks up the roll centre/axis, so make sure the outboard ends of the wishbones are not above parallel and likewise, don't deck the rear axle so much that it moves the wheel forward into the arch. To maintain roll centre axis, don't go any lower than 40mm. Fit poly or Vibratech rear wishbone bushes too as they are the achilles heel of the MK2 platform. It's sheeeeite basically. They lose castor mid bend and Castor is King these days..... in fact the rear wishbone needs replacing with something a lot better imo! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonrb 0 Posted April 12, 2006 Good advice, Kev. I've never understood the fascination with slamming. If you want crappy cornering ability then buy a Micra. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted April 12, 2006 Getting the suspension right for ALL conditions and scenarios is the hardest thing to do on a car, by far! Lowering suits the Corrado perfectly, but it does nothing to aid handling, other than lower the centre of gravity and there's a whole load more to it than that! Filling the tank and carrying passengers affects things, sure, but if the car has it's wishbones and axle at the optimum angle with no laden weight before hand, then the effects of the weight will be far less than if the wishbones were already pointing at the sky to begin with. The reason the VR6 is so high as standard is pure roll centre and axis related. VW put a lot of work into it, not that you'd think that to look at it but believe it or not, that is how high the suspension needs to be in order to maintain the correct roll centre and axis..... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Storm Warning 0 Posted May 29, 2006 kevhaywire, Sorry to bump this thread but I am interested about anything at the moment to do with handling. Its not that I am trying to change my Storm for a track day car, I just want to make a few improvements in handling. My std ride height results in 3 wheeled cornering which I imagine is not the best way to get about. I am considering an economic 40mm drop using lowering springs. Is it worth it? or should I be spending more on a full kit? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites