Jump to content
Riley

G60 AFR Wideband Logs 68mm VS 65mm Pulleys

Recommended Posts

Just thought i'd pop this here for anyone interested :thumbleft:

 

 

The specification being logged:

Ported charger.

68mm pully.

RSR Charger outlet.

Boost return deletion.

Heavily ported/polished and dewedged throttle body.

Sierra cosworth FMIC.

SNS 5.5 chip.

Ford red tops injectors - 312cc @ 3bar and 14.5ohms.

Porsche 3.5bar fuel pressure regulator.

 

 

First Run (Three logs): 60mph 4th gear to WOT through to 5th gear.

Log 1:

68mm_wot_60mph_4th_gear_log_zps9a068db2.jpg

 

 

Log 2: Showing only the WOT and gear change from above.

68mm_wot_60mph_4th_gear_change_log_zpseb60c9c7.jpg

 

 

Log 3: Showing the average AFR's of the above.

Min: 10

Max: 22

Average: 12 :cool:

68mm_wot_60mph_4th_gear_averages_log_zps834ca0b2.jpg

 

 

Second Run (Three logs): 80mph 5th gear to WOT.

Log 1:

68mm_wot_80mph_5th_gear_zps5743b98e.jpg

 

 

Log 2: Showing only the WOT from above.

68mm_wot_only_80mph_5th_gear_zpsd478833b.jpg

 

 

Log 3: Showing the average AFR's of the above.

Min: 11.9

Max: 12.8

Average: 12.3 :cool:

68mm_wot_only_80mph_5th_gear_averages_zps3287c9a6.jpg

 

 

So the most important part of all that is the bottom log, showing only full throttle (WOT) in 5th gear. With a minimum of 11.9AFR, Max of 12.8AFR (Perfect!!!!!) and Average of 12.3AFR (Slightly rich but good!!!) it shows that we are safe running this spec fueling wise.

 

 

And onto the 65mm Pulley

 

 

Fitted the new 65mm pulley along with new belt and small charger timing belt. Initial thoughts on driving home in traffic revealed an issue...As far as logging/measuring It gets to 'X' speed much quicker lol. It feels very much more pokey/faster and actually runs better! Especially at tickover and as far as throttle response (rpm rises quicker)

 

 

corrado_65mm_pulley_short_belt1_zpsb9986abc.jpg

 

 

corrado_65mm_pulley_short_belt2_zps2cb06c98.jpg

 

 

Anyway, onto the logging with the 65mm pulley. Same runs as before.

 

 

First Run (Three logs): 60mph 4th gear to WOT through to 5th gear.

Log 1:

65mm_wot_60mph_4th_gear_log_zpsb791b85b.jpg

 

 

Log 2: Showing only the WOT and gear change from above.

65mm_wot_60mph_4th_gear_change_log_zpsefae6c83.jpg

 

 

Log 3: Showing the average AFR's of the above.

Min: 10

Max: 19

Average: 12

65mm_wot_60mph_4th_gear_averages_log_zpsef485fe1.jpg

 

 

Second Run (Three logs): 80mph 5th gear to WOT.

Log 1:

65mm_wot_80mph_5th_gear_zps280c2172.jpg

 

 

Log 2: Showing only the WOT from above.

65mm_wot_only_80mph_5th_gear_zps0e590ef2.jpg

 

 

Log 3: Showing the average AFR's of the above.

Min: 11.7 (.2 drop)

Max: 13.3 (.5 rise)

Average: 12.4 (.1 rise) Good!!!

65mm_wot_only_80mph_5th_gear_averages_zps57f69067.jpg

 

 

So at wide open throttle in 5th gear, the 68mm pulley has an average AFR of 12.3 and the 65mm pulley has an average AFR of 12.4! All good. But the interesting thing is that the 65mm pulley runs leaner initially at full throttle. You can actually feel this as it seems to have more of a surge, and I'd say on the 68mm it felt more flat even though there was more fuel!

 

 

You can see this on the below image where I've put the 68 and 65 side by side, notice the 65mm runs leaner at initial wide open throttle. The red line running across is 12.8AFR, which most consider ideal fueling at WOT.

68mm_pulley_vs_65mm_pulley_zps951953c6.jpg

 

 

And there we have it...some 'rough' logs/results of 68 VS 65 pulleys.

 

 

Neil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems normal to me.

The sudden increase in boost due to the throttle body closing will cause a some spiking.

It will take the ecu a moment to adapt the fueling to suit.

 

I would only be concerned if it remained lean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems normal to me.

The sudden increase in boost due to the throttle body closing will cause a some spiking.

 

That's what I'm unsure on Owen...The lean spike is actually happening when the throttle body is fully open, WOT switch activated and hitting WOT map on the chip. Hmmm. Just thinking about my 20,000 year running issue, and wondering if it's there showing it's face on the logs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I meant.

There's going to be a few spikes at wot as the fuelling adjusts from the oxygen sensor and lambda probe.

It's far worse without the 5.5 chip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...