eatthis 0 Posted November 30, 2006 does the schrick do the same thing with a charger as it does na? anybody got a torque graph i could look at?????? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CorradoVR6-Turbo 0 Posted November 30, 2006 PM Radostormvr6,he has that set-up Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RADO.001 0 Posted December 1, 2006 yea it would be good to see what (if any) differance havin a charger & a schrick is to just a charger? bout very much better than a standard vr6 i would think!? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crasher 3 Posted December 1, 2006 It seems to work OK, when I did one I was a little sceptical that it wasn't going to work but so far so good. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin Bacon 5 Posted December 1, 2006 The Schrick + charger's torque curve is fatter up to 4000rpm than the stock manifold + charger because the charger isn't doing much below 4000rpm, so the advantages of the schrick's tuning are still there. Torque and power as peaks, are similar though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StormchargedVR6 0 Posted December 2, 2006 Heres my print out, need to drive another charged VR to see the difference. Its does pull well :) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adevr6 0 Posted December 2, 2006 my power/torque graph is similar to Radostormvr6,but where his torquue/power tails off-mine climbs a little more.think its the efficiency of the bvh on full throttle.gunner have to get a smaller pulley than the 8.5psi :(.just a bit sceptical of those mafless maps. i would post the graphs but dont know how to.its done a 317bhp/279torque and also a 303bhp/279 torque in recent years :D . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RS VR6 0 Posted December 2, 2006 I don't have my chart anymore...but its a difference I can feel. I used to have a dead spot from 2500 to 4k. With the Schrick...you can feel the pickup from ~2500 on. On my chart...not only did it bump the torque, it also kept it more consistant all the way to boost at 4k. The SC in sense works the same way as the Schrick 268's...it robs a bit of the low/midrange in order to give you that top end. The Schrick is a good compliment to the SC. It give you a significant amount of the torque in the midrange and once above 4k the charger takes over. The only strange thing you will feel is the switch over point at 4k. If you can get a good deal on the Schrick...its worth it! After the new year...I have a pair of Schrick 264/260 cams going in...we'll see how that goes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adevr6 0 Posted December 3, 2006 RS VR6-the 248s are the best match for the vr with the sc,vsr mani in my opinion. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RS VR6 0 Posted December 3, 2006 The 248's are more of a turbo type cam. VF actually recommends the 264/260 for their charger kits. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eatthis 0 Posted December 3, 2006 268s dont agree with 11 psi on stock cr Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
