Son of a Beesting 0 Posted September 27, 2004 Hello I was wondering what you lot out there think is better. Coilover or Damper/spring combo. Obviously I want the car to be lower (not drastically) and the ride not to be too affected although not bothered about it being stiffer. Dont really think I would do to much adjustment once I had them on. Just wondering what would make more sense. Money is a bit tight but willing to pay the extra if coilovers are substancially better. I had had the FK Konigsport coilovers recommended but if dampers the way to go what to look for? Thanking you Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joe M 0 Posted September 27, 2004 If its ride quality and a lower car you want theres not really any difference between good coilovers and a good damper/spring combo. Coilovers have the advantage that height can be changed to exactly how you want it to sit, or what I bought them for, so the car can be corner weighted to further improve handling. One thing not to do though is buy cheap coilovers, your better off getting a good make damper/spring combo for similar money. You wont go wrong with Koni, FK, H&R Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Edwards 0 Posted September 27, 2004 Coilovers tend to come with harder springs than lowering kits. H&R coilovers for example have springs that are half as stiff again as those of the H&R lowering kit. One other thing - front coilovers tend to weight quite a bit less than the standard spring/damper combination (especially ones fitted with lowering springs...) and this does seem to result in slightly quicker turn in. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bally 0 Posted September 27, 2004 Recomend coilovers allday long :D Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites