potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 abandoned supercharger for now, I need to remove my oxygen sensor from my corrado (without the computer knowing) and I need to advance my engine to 70 degrees advance. dont ask my why. google search joe cell. can I just advance the timing to this far as my car is now? G60 remember. does my computer take over after certain timing? please guys, I need to know. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Joe 0 Posted June 6, 2006 70 deg Advance?????? I know you said don't ask but surely thats a typo! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 no.... it is not, thats why I said this will get locked, because the thing violates physics. Im not kidding guys, can I advance my car to whatever I want, without the computer taking over? coming from an engineering major, I know this will work. =-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 I know..... but can I advance a C that far? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scruffythefirst 0 Posted June 6, 2006 No, you will not be able to run the engine at that advance, it will just stop. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dinkus 10 Posted June 6, 2006 Surely the Joe Cell is actually a complete load of twaddle? Have you actually made one of these magical devices? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H8RRA 0 Posted June 6, 2006 i fail to see why you feel this thread would be locked as it "defies te laws of physics" Are the mods now physics police??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
veeDuB_Rado 0 Posted June 6, 2006 Dunno, do they like to get physical with each other?! :lol: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 yes we made one, it runs a briggs and stratton engine 39cc. Its implosion, no twaddle. well I didnt think people would want to get in trouble, IE andy, because people have been confronted by national security agents about these things. scruffy, Im not running gasoline/petrol ;-) the question is will a corrado engine allow me to advance that far, IE can I spin the dizzy that far without the computer wanting to put it into retard, I will not be pinging or knocking. I would show you if I could. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
saysomestuff 0 Posted June 6, 2006 Surely at WOT the advance is more than 70 degrees. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dinkus 10 Posted June 6, 2006 I'd love to see a Joe Cell working, but the description on wikipedia (and indeed, very fact that it's on there) makes absolutely no sense from a physics point of view and nobody seems to have 1st had evidence that they work. As for national security bods hearing about it, I think we're pretty safe taking our chances :lol: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JMC 0 Posted June 6, 2006 Is this going to be in addtion to the electrolytic hydrogen cell or instead of it potatonet?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 in which system? the C's or the cells, it should be at more than that, the piston is experiencing implosion. its being pulled back to the source instead of away. it should be beyond 90 I believe. 70 is what someone had their ford at. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 Instead JMC, stage I is the hydrogen thing, this is something else, stage 1 of this process is the previous post, but this isnt hydrogen we are putting into the engine anymore, this is browns gas, this stuff implodes. its sub atomic gas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JMC 0 Posted June 6, 2006 What's sub atomic gas?? I was under the impression that all gas was either atomic or molecular. The only gas I've come across which would be sub atomic would be completely ionised hydrogen in the form of a plasma, split down to H+ atoms and e-'s. This would not last long in a metal container without extreme magnetic fields to contain it (and in fact you'd only be able to have H+ or e- due to the opposite charges). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scruffythefirst 0 Posted June 6, 2006 this is browns gas, this stuff implodes. its sub atomic gas. If its subatomic its not a gas by definition. Brownain motion has long been understood, and if you could actually run an engine on nothing, you'd be very rich. Instead, your a loon. No offence intended. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
STORM 2 0 Posted June 6, 2006 pons and fleischmann physics Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JMC 0 Posted June 6, 2006 pons and fleischmann physics Ah the revenge of cold (or should that be con) fusion :lol: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andi 2,147,483,647 Posted June 6, 2006 The only gas I've come across which would be sub atomic would be completely ionised hydrogen in the form of a plasma, Ah, it'll be a warp drive then. Not sure the spoiler extends enough for the nacelle to create the warp bubble to bend space around the car though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JMC 0 Posted June 6, 2006 The only gas I've come across which would be sub atomic would be completely ionised hydrogen in the form of a plasma, Ah, it'll be a warp drive then. Not sure the spoiler extends enough for the nacelle to create the warp bubble to bend space around the car though. Excuse me - nerd??? No, PhD in plasma chemistry (well maybe slightly nerdy). Free access to liquid nitrogen and solid CO2 though. Ah, the joys of a university education. Merely trying to get to the bottom of what potatonet is attempting to do... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dinkus 10 Posted June 6, 2006 No but knowing how a warp drive 'works' is nerdy... :lol: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 gas burns at 32 m^3/s water burns at 425m^3/s there are 26 particles before hydrogen btw, =-) you are negatively charging the water in the system and creating a field in which you can also negatively charge the water in the block. I will make a video if you like, but there are plenty out there. corrado's need to inject it into their intake system (cause we run cast iron, not as porous as AL), then after the car gets used to the engine being charged, it will require that you move the inlet pipe for the gas to a bolt on the block where the gas will be attracted to the positively charged engine, you must also change your timing as you progress off of fuel. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
potatonet 0 Posted June 6, 2006 ugh look at the videos JMC!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JMC 0 Posted June 6, 2006 Surely the rate at which a gas burns is dependent on the nature of the gas, molecular mass, it's density, amount of oxygen etc, rather than a single catch all figure for all gases?? Doesn't 'charged' water just earth when it touches the block, or does it not need a battery either? Just intrigued that's all... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites