fuzzywuzzy 10 Posted August 26, 2014 Just been looking at what my engine code is on my corrado vr6 (1994 on L) and found that it's AAA 0796517. I've been told by a friend that my original 2.9 engine must have been replaced with a 2.8 coz the engine code is wrong.. is that true? :-( Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
16VG60 1 Posted August 26, 2014 Unless your Corrado is an American SLC then yup it's most likely a wrongan. All UK spec VR6 Corrado were spec'd with the ABV 2.9 not the 2.8 AAA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
borachris 0 Posted August 26, 2014 I wouldn't be too disheartened, yes it's not the original engine, but it's still a VR, and the corrado it's in looks a million times better than the mk3 it came from ;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
16VG60 1 Posted August 26, 2014 Entirely right attitude. Would they but know it, I would wager that there are a lot of Corrados out there without their original engines. As the years pass by the activity of owners past is buried, only to be uncovered by the more observant or informed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
borachris 0 Posted August 26, 2014 Entirely right attitude. Would they but know it, I would wager that there are a lot of Corrados out there without their original engines. As the years pass by the activity of owners past is buried, only to be uncovered by the more observant or informed. Hit the nail on the head! My last corrado was supposed to be a 2.0 16v 9A, I didn't realise until after I'd taken the engine out and sold it that it was actually a 1.8 16v KR, well I say I realised, I didn't it was the guy who bought it when he pulled the head off and cc'd it. He wasn't happy but we came to an arrangement lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
16VG60 1 Posted August 26, 2014 This is a familiar story, we regularly see Classic Dubs and Audis which on inspection post or pre-purchase are found to be equipped with much changed components. I don't see this as an exclusively bad event. It at least proves it was loved enough to be kept running, and hey it can always be restored back to near original. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fuzzywuzzy 10 Posted August 26, 2014 It is a slight shame it's not the original engine, but it is a very good engine, so I'm lucky really. Hope it don't make too much difference in the speed lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Chatfield 0 Posted August 27, 2014 I'd rather have a heathy AAA than a poorly ABV. Rog. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
borachris 0 Posted August 27, 2014 I'd rather have a heathy AAA than a poorly ABV. Rog. Amen brother Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean_Jaymo 0 Posted August 27, 2014 Change the intake and throttle body and you're likely to get close to the abv power anyway. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Bowen 1 Posted August 27, 2014 Am about to replace my 2.9 with an 2.8, mainly because someone was selling brand new AAA blocks. Am going to use corrado inlet etc and also the 263 cams, so hoping it will be similar or more power than the standard 2.9 lump. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
g0ldf1ng3r 15 Posted August 27, 2014 Am about to replace my 2.9 with an 2.8, mainly because someone was selling brand new AAA blocks. Am going to use corrado inlet etc and also the 263 cams, so hoping it will be similar or more power than the standard 2.9 lump. nice jim - this will be interesting to see how it unfolds Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Chatfield 0 Posted August 27, 2014 Personally I think a fresh AAA will make just as much if not more if fitted with the ABV inlet tract than a 100k ABV, there is only 600cc difference between the two. Rog. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Bowen 1 Posted August 27, 2014 I still think they only made the 2.9 to make it sound more appealing to customers than the golf, otherwise everyone would of moaned about it just being a golf engine. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fuzzywuzzy 10 Posted August 27, 2014 Change the intake and throttle body and you're likely to get close to the abv power anyway. Yeah luckily they are the original ones, so thanx for telling me that, feel better about it all now :-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
subcool 0 Posted August 31, 2014 I've got an AAA block bored out to 2.9 when I exchanged the engine at tsr performance so that could happen to your car once... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dox 23 Posted August 31, 2014 I still think they only made the 2.9 to make it sound more appealing to customers than the golf, otherwise everyone would of moaned about it just being a golf engine. Its still a Golf engine, 2.9 MK3 syncro 4wd Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VW_OwneR_85 2 Posted August 31, 2014 Iv owned a mk3 vr6 and it felt just as quick as the corrado tbh.. Lol similar story actually , my friend whos into mk1 caddys recently pulled his motor out to find out that its actually got a 1.8 and the whole time hes owned it {more then 8 years} hes been buying parts for a 1.6 { carbs , spark plugs, etc } as that's what it was supposed to be.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fuzzywuzzy 10 Posted September 1, 2014 There is a chance that mine's been bored, the guy who had it before me had defo spent some serious dolla on this engine. She drives fantastic so I'm really happy :-) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites