potatonet

thank you saysomestuff, Browns gas is Helionon (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JoesCell2/message/447) - Walter Russell has a name for this gas unlike modern science. The name of this gas is Helionon the last element of the forth octave. Every thing that exists in the world has an opposite. So now you know that Browns gas is really Helionon, and it is the opposite of Hydrogen. You can see it plan as day with the bang test, so anyone that says that this is regular electrolyses is wrong. -- Nick (Apr 20, 2006) first designed in 1830 by sir william grove

right but NOS isnt cheap like water. we do worry about static fields and all types of electric fields... if you produce a large enough electric field 25kW you can make the cell float. oh and to get around the EM field you have to put Z..... something diodes on everything so they dont go past 15V. I think I can just put one of these diodes on the main coming from the battery and I should be ok. the diodes are not affected by the EM field produced. but currently we are going to use a carburated system and run it like that.

yeah this stuff is interesting to deal with I can say that much.

well if its a rocket fuel powered corrado then great, because its running on water. and orgone is what makes the joe cell run, Im not sure about the theory though william reich and einstein proved it.

you are correct it didnt run and I should have completed it to that point. I should have made a video of this stuff, and I will, I didnt think of the digital camera's video capability till today. joe cell idea was around for 200 years yes, method was lost till 92, physicist in the 30s developed the theory behind what happens, he wasnt building joe cells though, he was just developing theory on light and frequency of sound. 1992 was when the "joe cell" name came around because the guys name is joe from australia. he was "hushed up" (again we dont have proof) for about 6 years when he finally started doing it again and has been ever since. a guy here in the states that I actually talk to was "hushed up" as well less than 2 months ago. my engine doesnt have a crankshaft position sensor, only thing it senses is knock and detonation and then it retards or advances the timing based on what the knock sensor reads, approx 6.8kHz, being that this stuff explodes in the MHz range the knock sensor wont pick it up, or it will and something wierd will happen. yes a remap is best, BahnBrenner wont help me, they said "I cant help you with this", Im pretty sure he thinks I lost my marbles. I would talk to SNS but they only like to do things in person in the states, wierd I know. if this wont work on a C I will try it on a motorcycle, or something with a Carb because that seems to be what works. but at this time I wont be responding to anything else on this thread that has anything to do with a joe cell till I make a video of what I am doing. at that time I will post the video on here. shouldnt be more than 2 days from now being that the cell is at my friends house and I dont know if I am going over there tonight or not. got to get my switchblade key cut first =-)

briggs and straton aluminum(aluminium) engine, uses a magneto. we are looking for a motorcycle engine, this engine is for a weed wacker.

I would like to hear what your friend from cambridge has to say on the matter actually. oh and for everyone with an open mind we are making system with a motor suspended in a plastic box, no carb, no fuel, just the line from the cell going to a pipe that leads to the intake, and a battery to keep the negative on the cell. small 39cc motor. the only problem with college professors is they reiterate what they have been taught... dont worry we are working on it, only have time in the evening and on the weekends though. I will tape what happens with the cell's foam on my digital camera.

"It reacts violently with chlorine and fluorine, forming hydrohalic acids, which can damage the lungs and other tissues. In air, it is highly flammable, burning at concentrations as low as 4

F that storm, when you actually see the stuff then you tell me its not reproducable or applicable, until then buy petrol. I was playing with the foam/gas this evening its highly volatile stuff, and if any of you have been reading posts on google its whats called stage 3, which means we are ready for testing on an engine, we are going to use a watercooled carbeurator engine. we created an implosion tube of the stuff but our method for lighting it wasnt very reliable, we are going to make another one with a spark plug, but it worked. bc, no Im not trying to make people think Im smart at all, the purpose of this thread was to ask if I could advance my car 70 degrees at the crank, but it turned into this lengthy discussion of what I am doing and why I am doing and the theory that no one understands that barely supports what I am doing. I am an alternative energy major at cal poly. Im not a thermodynamics major, tho there is some thermo involved in this process. I absolutely hate corrado coolant systems with a passion because they are flimsy and crappy, VW uses crappy plastic that is their ultimate problem, PS Im also a materials engineer. when I have problems with my C, its normally because I unplugged something somewhere that did something important or I didnt tighten a bolt correctly, or something fell off the car, believe me all the above have happened. the person who owned my car before me treated it like crap and I am here now trying to restore something that was once beautiful and its a real challenge. I just thought if I am restoring it I might as well revolutionize it because thats how I do things, I was the first person to even attempt to put the AMG charger on a corrado and I succeeded in getting the brackets made and the supports in place, all I had left to do was to put on the CO bung on intercooler lines and put a chip in the car and it was off to the races, but I dont want 10 mpg as darrin states, I want to do something better than petrol. Its my major for christ sakes and if I get the chance to do something that physically is impossible I am going to do it, it might get me another degree in some way. being as this system requires so little to generate so much I decided it was perfect, notice how I abandoned hydrogen fuel injection on the other forum. well if I can get 400hp out of a corrado that sucks the cylinders closed instead of pushing them open and only do a few simple things, then I will do it. and yes one of those simple things is actually breaking what everyone thinks on this forum as the ultimate answer. 90

JMC WHAT THE HE|_|_ are you talking about :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :-P

the throttle works by inputting a certain amount of oxygen for this to work, sometimes throttle doesnt work and the thing just revs up on its own. we are either burning one of these things: gammanon alphanon betanon quentin all are cosmic gasses, quentin and gammanon are subatomic. I calculated it to be alphanon or another gas (eykaon), but that doesnt make sense because alphanon actually has mass. http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/8989/russtbl.gif that is the true periodic table I am sorry to say fellas, everything is measured out in frequency here, not atomic mass.

it would undoubtedly crash the american economy if this stuff "does what everyone says it does"

who says they arent already coxy ;-)

want to know why it explodes? because the whole engine is saturated in it because the engine is positively charged, it attracts the gas, so if its saturated in the engine it means there is some in the chambers, when it gets fired more gets created

dinkus, exactly hydrogen burns, this stuff doesnt burn, there is not flame, just a violent implosive reaction. and when I say no flame I mean no flame, if you have flame its because you got the charged water No argument at all, I just didnt mean to offend him. JMC if I could mail you one without the government stopping the over seas transit I would. the problem is that you would have to make your own charged water as Xray machines discharge the water. Im going to make video's guys. no worries.

Im sorry, I will take your word on you saying you have the degree.

G60jet you are correct, the line is not actually fed into the intake system once the engine is charged. G60greeny, buy the VR6, coming from a G60 owner. JMC I know you have heard of a neutrino, well isnt it just a little hard to imagine that this is the only thing small enough to go through pretty much everything it encounters? imagine for a second that you found an energy source that acted like a neutrino, and caused an implosion. PS, they are making a facility on the swiss/french border to do this. and dont tell me that I've lost my marbles because I havent....yet.

well I dont understand why JMC cant possibly see why it could be true, if he has the degree and all. I say that letting anything theory after magnetons go will help you understand.

I've lit the stuff from the 3rd stage, and it does what people say it does, I am building an implosion chamber today and will throw a video up when we get it completed. =-)

somehow the engine block gets positively charged using the lead from the positive terminal. havent gotten my car running on it at the moment so its hard to explain.

ugh look at the videos JMC!!!!

gas burns at 32 m^3/s water burns at 425m^3/s there are 26 particles before hydrogen btw, =-) you are negatively charging the water in the system and creating a field in which you can also negatively charge the water in the block. I will make a video if you like, but there are plenty out there. corrado's need to inject it into their intake system (cause we run cast iron, not as porous as AL), then after the car gets used to the engine being charged, it will require that you move the inlet pipe for the gas to a bolt on the block where the gas will be attracted to the positively charged engine, you must also change your timing as you progress off of fuel.

Instead JMC, stage I is the hydrogen thing, this is something else, stage 1 of this process is the previous post, but this isnt hydrogen we are putting into the engine anymore, this is browns gas, this stuff implodes. its sub atomic gas.

in which system? the C's or the cells, it should be at more than that, the piston is experiencing implosion. its being pulled back to the source instead of away. it should be beyond 90 I believe. 70 is what someone had their ford at.

yes we made one, it runs a briggs and stratton engine 39cc. Its implosion, no twaddle. well I didnt think people would want to get in trouble, IE andy, because people have been confronted by national security agents about these things. scruffy, Im not running gasoline/petrol ;-) the question is will a corrado engine allow me to advance that far, IE can I spin the dizzy that far without the computer wanting to put it into retard, I will not be pinging or knocking. I would show you if I could.