Henny 0 Posted October 25, 2004 yup, MKIII 2.0 16V box... 8) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
coolrado 0 Posted October 25, 2004 is the mk3 2L 16v box a straight swap then as i know of a mk3 with rear fire damage (caravan it was towing was crashed into and crushed the propane cylinder :onfire: ) will have to find out if its a 2L though Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 25, 2004 coolrado, nice :lol: Cheers guys off to my local to find one at weekend, how much should i expect to pay for one from a specialist/breaker and a scrap yard? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RACK 0 Posted October 26, 2004 The one's I found were between £150 & £250. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iow_corrado_g60 0 Posted April 18, 2006 thought id dig this one back up did anyone change this box and see how it run for a while? any opinions compared to a standard g60 box or a g60 with vr 1st and 2nd gears Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olly elworthy 0 Posted April 18, 2006 someone did,, not sure who though,, those boxes are super strong though i know of two big power 1.8T golfs using them with no problems whatsoever Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iow_corrado_g60 0 Posted April 18, 2006 olly sorry mate are you referring to the mk3 2ltr 16v? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olly elworthy 0 Posted April 18, 2006 have a look here mate,, http://the-corrado.net/.archive/forum/viewtopic. ... highlight= but yeah either a mk3 2ltr 16v box or a passat 2ltr 16v box,, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iow_corrado_g60 0 Posted April 18, 2006 olly thats this thread matey! lol! thats good about the mk3 2ltr! might investigate that after fmic and sc rebuild! (that wuill be about 10years then lol! when you getting your's dyno'd buddy? would like to no the power could v.interesting?! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olly elworthy 0 Posted April 18, 2006 need to get her remapped once i have fitted my toothed belt kit,, should produce decent power seem to have all the right bits on there now, big valve head FMIC etc etc,, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
young lad 0 Posted April 18, 2006 Ok this thread is really interesting. So basically the Mrk lll 2.0 GTI 16v Gearbox is better to use then the Corrado G60 gearbox. So i pressume the mrk lll 2.0 16v Gearbox would improve 0-60's and basically make the car much quicker ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
young lad 0 Posted April 21, 2006 Ok this thread is really interesting. So basically the Mrk lll 2.0 GTI 16v Gearbox is better to use then the Corrado G60 gearbox. So i pressume the mrk lll 2.0 16v Gearbox would improve 0-60's and basically make the car much quicker ? Anyone ? :roll: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
olly elworthy 0 Posted April 21, 2006 yeap but think you will be pulling a couple more revs when cruising on the motorway,, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dub Style 0 Posted August 18, 2006 Does anyone know if the Corrado 2.0 16v gearbox is the same as golf mk3 and what is the code for this gearbox Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
atif 0 Posted August 18, 2006 I once owned the corrado which had the MK3 16V gearbox!! its a straight swap and means u get longer ratios when you get higher up the revs therefore not having to change up so quick!! It will do 60+ in 2nd gear! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob_B 0 Posted September 11, 2006 will the G60 driveshafts fit the MK3 16V gearbox? will the G60 starter motor fit the 16V box? what about the G60 selector? help much appreciated party people Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
corraptor_evo 0 Posted October 16, 2006 Hello, boys! I watch this subject becouse i'm extremely interested. I have a Corrado G60 (of course :D !). It had a stock ATA gear box (ratios: 3.778; 2.105; 1.345; 0.971; 0.795; FR 3.684). I fitted a Syncro system with CBC:(3.778; 2.117; 1.360; 0.966; 0.795; FR 3.938). I lost over one second to 100 Km/h (60 mph) and gain 3/4 of a gallon in consumption :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: . Now, I want to keep the case, swap the CBC internals with a CCM: (3.300; 1.944; 1,308; 1.034; FR 3.348) or a ASD (3,300; 1.944; 1.308; 0.917; 0.717; FR 3.158). Can anyone tell me SURE what will happen? What I'll gain and what I'll loose? Thank you all! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flusted 0 Posted October 16, 2006 took my g60 on mainland the other day and with a 1.8 16v box, i was topping out at 100mph in 4th at redline which is bad so avoid the 1.8 16v box on the g60 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy665 0 Posted October 20, 2006 Just won a G60 box on E-Bay for £60, decided to go down the route of VR 1st and 2nd ratios with a Peloquin diff - nice little winter project Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toad 0 Posted October 20, 2006 took my g60 on mainland the other day and with a 1.8 16v box, i was topping out at 100mph in 4th at redline which is bad so avoid the 1.8 16v box on the g60 What's so bad about that? wonder what you'd have had at top wack? The valvers hit 80 in third without redlining it. I guess you were a fair way off 60 in second? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy T 0 Posted October 20, 2006 Ok this thread is really interesting. So basically the Mrk lll 2.0 GTI 16v Gearbox is better to use then the Corrado G60 gearbox. So i pressume the mrk lll 2.0 16v Gearbox would improve 0-60's and basically make the car much quicker ? Anyone ? :roll:[/quote:1f109] If it was lower geared, which I doubt, It wouldn't make the car quicker. The G60 is pretty low geared so going any lower will make first gear useless and the other gears wont be matched to the torque curve. There's no point changing ratio's unless its a proven mod like Andy665 mentions about VR higher ratio 1st & 2nd gears - usually done to complement an upgrade in power. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flusted 0 Posted October 20, 2006 took my g60 on mainland the other day and with a 1.8 16v box, i was topping out at 100mph in 4th at redline which is bad so avoid the 1.8 16v box on the g60 What's so bad about that? wonder what you'd have had at top wack? The valvers hit 80 in third without redlining it. I guess you were a fair way off 60 in second? I reckon it would of topped out at about 120mph :roll: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toad 0 Posted October 20, 2006 took my g60 on mainland the other day and with a 1.8 16v box, i was topping out at 100mph in 4th at redline which is bad so avoid the 1.8 16v box on the g60 What's so bad about that? wonder what you'd have had at top wack? The valvers hit 80 in third without redlining it. I guess you were a fair way off 60 in second? I reckon it would of topped out at about 120mph :roll: And you're after 150 odd? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flusted 0 Posted October 21, 2006 no, just couldnt cruise at 100ish in 5th as it was at about 4.5k and felt sorry for my charger! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites